view counter
 
view counter
 
 

ORC Rules On Whelan Appeals, Three Others

Published: November 23, 2010 11:33 am ET

Last Comment: November 29, 2010 1:21 pm ET | 7 Comment(s) | Jump to Comments

The Ontario Racing Commission today released its rulings on multiple appeals, two of which pertained to Furosemide positives on a horse trained by Walter Whelan.

Whelan appealed Judges’ Ruling SB 42428/10, dated August 13, 2010, wherein he was suspended for a period of seven days and fined $500 as a result of a positive test for Furosemide, taken from the horse Perfect Host, trained by Whelan, which finished first in the Race 8 at Flamboro Downs on July 11, 2010.

Whelan also appealed Judges’ Ruling SB 42441/10, dated September 16, 2010, wherein he was suspended for a period of 15 days, and fined the sum of $1,000, and Judges’ Ruling SB 42441/10, which suspended Perfect Host for 15 days, as a result of a positive test for Furosemide taken from Perfect Host, which finished first in Race 1 at Flamboro Downs on August 28, 2010.

On November 17, 2010, an ORC panel consisting of chair Rod Seiling, commissioner Dan Nixon and commissioner Pam Frostad was convened to hear the appeals.

Angela Holland appeared as counsel for the administration, Jean Marc Mackenize appeared as counsel for Whelan and Whelan attended the hearing in person.

Upon hearing the testimony of senior judge William Maertens, Dr. Michael Weber, and Whelan, upon reviewing the exhibits filed and upon hearing the submissions of counsel for the administration and counsel for Whelan, the panel granted the appeals.

To read the overview and background on the matter, and to read the ORC's reasons for decision, view an official copy of the ruling by clicking here.

In addition the ruling on the Whelan appeal, the ORC today released rulings in regard to an appeal the 2010 Confederation Cup and three other appeals.

Click on the links below to view the official rulings.

COM SB 051/2010 - MacDonald, Anthony
COM SB 052/2010 - MacDonald, Anthony
COM SB 053/2010 - Spence, Brenda

(With files from the ORC)

November 29, 2010 - 1:21 pmAs a vet, I thought I would

Alison Moore SAID...

As a vet, I thought I would put forth my two cents- sorry for the length.
Lasix is a loop diuretic which means is acts specifically on a part of the kidney to cause not only fluid loss but significant losses of potassium, calcium and chloride. Horses on the program must be managed accordingly, otherwise, they can develop conditions such as atrial fibrillation (flipped heart), thumps and/or tying up to name a few.
Having said that though, the Lasix program was originally developed to protect the health of the horse. Research studies involving treadmill tests as well as track workouts have demonstrated that Lasix does reduce the severity of bleeding (EIPH) likely through a decrease in pulmonary arterial pressure amongst other things. However, when looking at horses racing on Lasix (primarily thoroughbreds) the numbers that bleed still seem to remain the same, however, in general, performances improve. This begs the question, does Lasix improve performance through improving the severity of bleeding or through other mechanisms such as weight loss (which has recently been demonstrated), as a calming agent or as a masking agent etc.? If there was only one cause of bleeding, there would only be one medication to treat it – however, there are many causes including airway inflammation (allergies, post-viral inflammation), atrial fibrillation (or other cardiac arrhythmias), functional upper airway problems (ie displaced soft palates) , and lameness particularly sore front feet/legs in trotters. The reason speculated for the latter is that, trotters that are lame in the front feet/leg shift more of their weight to the hind end. Because they have a diagonal gait, they compress the abdominal organs against the back part of the diaphragm and lungs, where bleeding from the lung begins (this is at the level of the 17th rib – almost to the flank area). And yes, it is likely that most horses bleed, but then most if not all horses that are athletes also bleed to some degree (ie barrel racers, jumpers ,draft horses that pull). If one was to do a lung wash on every horse after it races blood would be present in the fluid (and we don't know how this impacts performance). But because we only check them with endoscopy we only see blood in horses that have bled significantly for the blood to have traveled from the level of the 17th rib to the windpipe. There is a lot of controversy in the veterinary world concerning the use of Lasix for EIPH – hopefully a better choice can be found but it won’t likely occur anytime soon. Other “bleeder” shots out there are also diuretics and can cause some of the same side effects as Lasix. As for the horse that started this conversation, “Perfect Host” aka “Spanky” is a fat and shiny, beautiful black stud horse, who is utterly spoiled by Walter. He’s been on the Lasix program on and off since 2002 and looks no worse the wear for it. He would make a great riding horse, when retired, and I would not be concerned about the status of his lungs (only about the presence of his testicles!)

November 27, 2010 - 11:25 amBottom line is that there

Greg Parke SAID...

Bottom line is that there are drugs for bleeders that are far easier on a horse and less damaging than lasix. Besides, lasix is a diuretic which we all know can be used to mask other drugs which raises the question, why is it being used.

Greg Parke

November 25, 2010 - 9:47 pmShayne Barrington Horses

Shayne Barrington

Horses bleed naturally?? That means "all" horses bleed?? And there is a "normal" amount of bleeding?? All we need to do to combat bleeding is to leave them outside longer when they are young?? And you say lasix horses will be worth nothing when they retire??? I'm glad your not a spokesperson for OSAS!!! Mrs. Magee you also go on to say that lasix does "sludge up" the blood not allowing the oxygen in the blood to get to the brain,legs etc. These statements are what I find incredible!!! Dr. Llewellyn could you please explain to this lady(and the rest of this websites readers) the real purpose and effects of the lasix program so we can all get a veterinarian's point of view instead of some one's opinion.

Thank you
Shayne

November 25, 2010 - 10:39 amI'm in agreement with Mr.

Lynne Magee SAID...

I'm in agreement with Mr. Jackson. Ban Lasix. Horses bleed naturally with the exertion levels that they go through during racing. If the extent of that bleeding excedes "normal", why the heck are they still racing? The lungs of a horse that bleeds beyond normal are probably shot to heck, likely caused by spending far too much time indoors as young horses and breathing in dusty air. Can you imagine what these horses are going to be like when they are retired from racing? Likely good for nothing and in a terrible state due to breathing problems.
The use of Lasix is far too common. I can't for the life of me understand why a drug such as this, diuretic in nature, is allowed in any sport. High performance horses require more hydration not less. Just think about how the blood travels more quickly through the horses' systems taking oxygen to the brain, lungs, legs, etc. as required due to the extreme amount of work being done. Now sludge it up and what are those very important organs and body systems getting in the way of fresh blood carrying much needed oxygen? It blows my mind that we have allowed this to go on this long. Incredible!

November 24, 2010 - 10:40 pmhow about banning all lasix

how about banning all lasix

November 24, 2010 - 3:19 pmI am a fan of this

I am a fan of this sport.
I've read the abbreviated transcript of the recent ORC judgements on Whelan and MacDonald.
They read more like an Abbott and Costello routine, than a legal proceeding affecting the lives of real people and the integrity of our sport.

I am not questioning the hearings or judgements themselves, simply the manner in which they were conducted , heard and rendered.

A much higher level of professionalism is in order.

November 23, 2010 - 7:22 pmWalter Whelan is a friend

Walter Whelan is a friend and client of mine and showed me the horse Perfect Host, that received the positive Lasix test.On approaching the horse he flexed and twisted his neck, which apparently is an idiosyncrasy of his. To administer an intravenous injection to this horse is difficult because of this habit. An alternate explanation for the positive test is that some of the Lasix was injected perivascularly {outside the vein}.This would affect the test result owing to a different rate of absorption. The horse had received Lasix many times without problem, so I doubt that his metabolism is different from that of other horses and the actual problem is inadvertent perivascular injection.To prevent any suspicion of prior treatment of this horse or of a metabolic anomaly,I would suggest a blood sample be taken prior to the administration of Lasix. Should the horse be called in for testing and the Lasix level is higher than it should be, the pre race sample could then be analysed.This would remove the fear of a positive test from the unwitting trainer or confirm prior administration.
I understand the significant cost of testing but this situation is rare and a simple pre race blood sample would clarify the situation.


view counter
 
 
 

© 2021 Standardbred Canada. All rights reserved. Use of this site signifies your agreement and compliance with the legal disclaimer and privacy policy.

Firefox 3 Best with IE 7 Built with Drupal